<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad scupltor, you are.</title>
	<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/</link>
	<description>The Home for Odd, Ugly and Neglected Toys</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>Indy Williams toy? I'll have to check it out the next time I'm in the toy aisle. I haven't really checked out the new Indy toys. Are they any good? Any cool monster-like toys in the set?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indy Williams toy? I&#8217;ll have to check it out the next time I&#8217;m in the toy aisle. I haven&#8217;t really checked out the new Indy toys. Are they any good? Any cool monster-like toys in the set?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BubbaShelby</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>BubbaShelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Funny, I was just glancing at a Raider's of the Lost Ark 3.75" action figure at Wal-Mart yesterday and was struck by how much Indy looked like Robin Williams!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I was just glancing at a Raider&#8217;s of the Lost Ark 3.75&#8243; action figure at Wal-Mart yesterday and was struck by how much Indy looked like Robin Williams!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayo</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>mayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>HAHAHaa so true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHaa so true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meeklo</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Meeklo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>HAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niesg</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>niesg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>I think malakili looks more like stephen fry...  http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&#38;q=stephen+fry&#38;um=1&#38;ie=UTF-8&#38;sa=N&#38;tab=wi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think malakili looks more like stephen fry&#8230;  <a href="http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&amp;q=stephen+fry&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&amp;q=stephen+fry&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>I think some modern figures do use that scanning  technology, but these actors faces were most likely not scanned. I say this, because these toys came around 15+ years after the original movies. I doubt they'd use the "current state" of an actor's face. Plus, finding all the actors and flying them out to a scanning station for a star wars figure doesn't seem feasible... but I'm sure George Lucas could afford it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some modern figures do use that scanning  technology, but these actors faces were most likely not scanned. I say this, because these toys came around 15+ years after the original movies. I doubt they&#8217;d use the &#8220;current state&#8221; of an actor&#8217;s face. Plus, finding all the actors and flying them out to a scanning station for a star wars figure doesn&#8217;t seem feasible&#8230; but I&#8217;m sure George Lucas could afford it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garsh</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>garsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.weirdotoys.com/2008/02/06/bad-scupltor-you-are/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that modern figures like these underwent a computer process where the actor's face is laser scanned and then a machine uses the coordinates to create the sculpt. Stereo-lithography, I think they call it. Although I understand right, sculptors still touch-up the computer's initial product. So I wonder who's more at fault?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that modern figures like these underwent a computer process where the actor&#8217;s face is laser scanned and then a machine uses the coordinates to create the sculpt. Stereo-lithography, I think they call it. Although I understand right, sculptors still touch-up the computer&#8217;s initial product. So I wonder who&#8217;s more at fault?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
